martes, 17 de mayo de 2011

sridevi

sridevi. Sridevi Photos, Sridevi
  • Sridevi Photos, Sridevi


  • asphalt-proof
    Jan 13, 09:07 PM
    My predictions are thus: (feel free to write them down and pass them down to your grandchildren to be read as scripture)

    1. There will be much "boom-age"

    2. But it will be a hollow sounding 'boom'

    3. iTunes rentals of movies

    4. Updates on on the laptop line

    5. A presentation of of the SDK and what some devs have already produced on it along with a software update on iphone

    6. A heartfelt thanks to the employees and their families

    6. end of Keynote

    7. Much weeping and lamentation on the internets.


    I think that "something in the Air" may be referring to rentals of movies, and maybe .Mac intergration with the iPhone. Maybe there will be an ultralight macbook released as well, but don't we usually see SOME evidence of something concrete by this time. If nothing else, at least a blurry photo of something in an elevator. but this time, nothing.... nada. Maybe they have found all the leaks and have efficiently and effectively plugged them. But it just seems too quiet. I predict a less than exciting Macworld this year.:(




    sridevi. Sridevi and Boney Kapoor
  • Sridevi and Boney Kapoor


  • dont24
    Nov 24, 08:12 AM
    Hopefully it still applies to corporate discounts too. Can anyone confirm what?

    Looks like it does. I checked the corporate discount page. The 24" iMac regular $1999, is $1880 - $101. Not bad. $1779 shipped.
    Too bad there's no savings on the Mac Pro.




    sridevi. sridevi 04 jpg
  • sridevi 04 jpg


  • Warbrain
    Sep 12, 08:13 AM
    I dunno. I would think they'd wait to revise to iTunes 7.0 for Leopard. It would just make more sense to start with the new number with the new OS. After all, it's only a short time away, why start on like a 7.1.3 when you can start on good ol 7.0?

    Doesn't mean squat to Apple what version of iTunes ships with Leopard. iTunes is pretty much it's own entity now within the OS. It's not necessary to update version numbers with the OS. And anyway, it's cross-platform.




    sridevi. Sridevi
  • Sridevi


  • varcos
    Jan 9, 04:22 PM
    Actually, if you haven't had any spoilers yet, don't go to the any other page on the Apple site (there's a spoiler in the navigation bar), only do the straight to the mwsf07 link.




    sridevi. Sridevi - South Indian Actress
  • Sridevi - South Indian Actress


  • mscriv
    Apr 27, 04:13 PM
    Hmmm... how can I use this new system to my advantage in the MRville WW game? ;)




    sridevi. Sridevi Wedding Reception
  • Sridevi Wedding Reception


  • penter
    Dec 25, 02:20 PM
    Yes they do. BUT not when it means a crap ass experience for the customer. Because that just results in returns, complaints etc. LTE right now is only in a handful of major cities and not even perfect coverage there.

    As for the whole "but android" argument, Apple doesn't do things just because everyone else does. Which is why we still don't have blu-ray in their computers despite every other computer (including even some so called netbooks) having had blu-ray drives for at least the last year. We also don't have Flash in the iphone etc despite every other smart phone having Flash and every other announced tablet saying it would.

    I don't buy the flash argument. Thats actually a pretty complicated subject...
    But I see what you mean.

    Now, can anyone please explain what the difference between 'true 4G' and LTE?
    Is LTE something else entirely? Something that bridges the CDMA and GSM technologies, allowing CDMA phones to use chips, and chip-based phones to be compatible with CDMA networks?
    I've wikipediaed the whole deal, but i don't really get it...
    It seems like there are *two* kinds of LTE as well. Is that where the difference between true 4G and fake 4G lies? One is LTE, and the other is TRUE LTE?
    And how can a carrier say it has 4G, if its not *really* 4G? is it just a glorified 3G system?

    On a different note, Christmas is here... any news on the Verizon iPhone release?

    Sry for so many questions




    sridevi. Sridevi
  • Sridevi


  • zeemeerman2
    May 3, 03:44 PM
    But anyways, I don't think anyone would choose an OS just for one reason alone. Some might, of course.
    Lots of people have been choosing the iphone over Android for years when iOS lacked tethering, for example.

    But of course, I chose my OS (and smartphone) for only 1 reason.
    I wanted to tether the EDGE/HSDPA signal to my MacBook, and only iOS and Android did that. My carrier allows me to jailbreak, root, tether, whatever you like, for no additional costs.

    Since then I just wanted the cheapest phone with that functionality from a well-known brand so I didn't end with junk, I came up with the HTC Wildfire (250 euros).
    The iPhone was just too expensive at 700+ euros unlocked.

    My Wildfire + Mobile Vikings (https://mobilevikings.com/en/) (Belgium preferred) = Epic combo! And I'm not bound to a contract, as with many other providers.
    That, and my iPod Touch 2G for multimedia, since it's more powerful than the Wildfire hands down. (And I can still tether the internet to my iPod if I wanted to...)




    sridevi. Sridevi.
  • Sridevi.


  • Hastings101
    May 3, 10:05 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8H7)



    Apple commercials are bright, uplifting and show how technology enhances the human experience. They show people using iPads, iPhones, MacBooks, etc in everyday situations. However Android Zoom, BB Playbook, Tab are dark, joyless with people abducted by aliens, enveloped and overpowered by machines, etc.

    I think there's something magical and revolutionary about getting kidnapped by aliens and overpowered by machines. You just don't see that stuff happening too often in life, and we need to enjoy it when it happens.




    sridevi. Tamil Actress Sridevi
  • Tamil Actress Sridevi


  • calculus
    Jan 12, 02:42 AM
    i was hoping for something revolutionary.

    Overthrow of the government?




    sridevi. Sridevi Kapoor. Posted by PKP
  • Sridevi Kapoor. Posted by PKP


  • Evoken
    Apr 6, 11:30 PM
    Considering that we haven't had any substantial update since Leopard (as Snow Leopard was more an under the hood thing), which launched 4 years ago, the same year the original iPhone launched; the list of features that are being shown for Lion are downright underwhelming.

    - The Mac App Store
    This is not a part of the OS itself and I can use it right now. This is also hardly an innovation.

    - Launchpad
    This is just a slightly different take on the stacks concept, borrowing from the way it is handled in the iPad.

    - Full-screen apps
    Hmmm....ok...how is this a big deal again?

    - Mission Control
    Just a tweak on the present expose concept. I find it looks a bit cumbersome/clunky.

    - Auto save
    Hmmm....ok...how is this a big deal again?

    - Versions
    Hmmm....ok, useful.

    - Resume
    This one is good.

    - Mail 5
    Now with conversations, something Gmail has had for a long while already.

    - AirDrop
    Interesting but I think not all that different from using Bonjour to transfer files.

    And...that's very much it...

    Don't get me wrong, I am a fan of Apple as much as the next guy but this feature set is hardly impressive. I remember back when Apple released 10.4, I was actually excited about the new features and couldn't wait to update my computer. But now? I feel very much indifferent about Lion, don't see anything innovative or exciting at all, specially when one considers that the last update to include additional features as opposed to under the hood improvements (10.5) was released four years ago.




    sridevi. Tags: sridevi saree photos,
  • Tags: sridevi saree photos,


  • davelanger
    Apr 8, 05:03 PM
    I wonder what the special promotion is.

    They want to get rid of all their ipad 2 stock because the ipad 3 will be out for xmas.




    sridevi. Sridevi#39;s Comeback
  • Sridevi#39;s Comeback


  • eternlgladiator
    Apr 8, 11:48 AM
    I've been waiting all week for this to finally become available. I can't wait!

    I'm going to upgrade it to a 128 GB SSD when I get it. It'll be a monster.




    sridevi. Sridevi
  • Sridevi


  • Winni
    Mar 9, 06:43 AM
    I won't get into a furball over your post. Which large tech company operates in a candid & open way with customers?

    I don't know about "candid", but "open" as in "dialogue" certainly describes the way in which Microsoft, Dell, IBM and several other enterprise elephants communicate with their (enterprise) customers. It's mandatory for their business.




    sridevi. Sridevi Birthday Celebrations
  • Sridevi Birthday Celebrations


  • door4
    Sep 12, 08:12 AM
    The link from Transporter 2 includes Movies+Trailers in the URL. As does the one below it, the other two include Games+Trailers.

    Here's the full link from the Transporter 2 bit.

    http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/inboundRedirect?omni-ch=Store+Front&omni-pg=Movie+Trailers&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apple.com%2Fmoviesxml%2Fh%2Findex.xml


    Clicking that link calls up a whitepage saying Itunes store being updated ( from the US)




    sridevi. Sridevi Witch
  • Sridevi Witch


  • ZbHRP
    Mar 25, 06:26 AM
    I would like to say thanks to Vista for making me switch to OS X! :)

    In all serious-ness I did fell in love to OS X back in just didn't have the money for it.




    sridevi. Actress Sridevi
  • Actress Sridevi


  • TuffLuffJimmy
    Apr 26, 11:32 AM
    Am I missing something totally obvious here? But what's that slot above the earpiece speaker meant to be exactly?

    Like I say maybe I missed something as looking at their comparison images they seem to imply the current iPhone 4 has one already?!!?

    What gives?

    Sensors. That same slot is on the iPhone 4, although I don't have one handy to check if it looks the same. It's just harder to see on the black one because, well, it's black too.




    sridevi. stillssridevi engagement
  • stillssridevi engagement


  • SkippyThorson
    Oct 6, 10:50 AM
    Finally, a Verizon commercial that I like!


    +1

    Clever on their part. Perhaps AT&T will get a clue, or perhaps Verizon is just asking to get the iPhone handed to them. ;)




    sridevi. Sridevi is one such name.
  • Sridevi is one such name.


  • Chundles
    Sep 12, 03:00 AM
    Zealund?? :confused:

    :D

    Damn! I thought I was quick enough.

    I originally had "Noo Zulund" but edited it back, missed the second u, changed it again - not quick enough.

    Mind you, your quote of me wasn't quite quick enough, it's spelt correctly there.




    sridevi. Sridevi photos, Sridevi
  • Sridevi photos, Sridevi


  • Chris in SJ
    Jan 9, 05:12 PM
    Just wait, it will eventually play

    Ummm.. just out of curiousity.. when you say 'eventually' do you mean 1 minute? 5 minutes? 30 minutes? 90 minutes?

    I have been waiting here for 15 minutes and it's still not playing..

    You'd think they would just not make it available until they could meet demand..

    - C




    grmatt
    Apr 6, 07:50 AM
    And what was the motivation of the third party app makers? To make a fast buck out of serving ads to people more interested in the ad than the product. That is bad for advertisers and probably the real reason the app was rejected.

    Who know whether clicks inside this app count as regular impressions? Unlike any third party, Apple is in a position to refund any advertisers for clicks on these ads. If they are doing that then I don't see anything wrong with them releasing this niche product.

    Yup. The developers of said app must've known they were playing with fire. Apple helped these advertisers make their apps, they should be the one allowed to showcase them.




    CalBoy
    Apr 14, 10:50 PM
    I understand the point you are trying to make (re: enhanced security measures] but technically those two incidents had nothing to do with the TSA since they both flew from non-USA airports - that is, the TSA didn't screen them at all.

    While this is true, we can't allow that technicality to wipe the slate clean. Our security as a whole is deficient, even if the TSA on its own might not be responsible for these two particular failures. Our tax dollars are still going to the our mutual safety so we should expect more.

    I guess that depends on how you define "not much trouble". We can't know the actual number, since we will never know many actually get through. But they are catching over half the weapons that their own agents try to smuggle through on test/training runs. So that counts as being "some trouble". How much "trouble" is enough? Read my post above about how much risk a "bad person" organization is willing to take on 50/50 odds. My late father made his career "gaming" situations, so I have a bit of a passing knowledge of it. I am certain that the TSA has "gamed" the odds, and the TSA believe that they have reached a reasonable balance between costing the public time, money, and indignities - and - ensuring a reasonable level of safety for the flying public. They may be wrong.... but I would bet money that, to the best of their ability, they believe they have reached a balance.

    Well when a fanatic is willing to commit suicide because he believes that he'll be rewarded in heaven, 50/50 odds don't seem to be all that much of a deterrent. What's worse is that we've only achieved that with a lot of our personal dignity, time, and money. I don't think we can tolerate much more. We should be expecting more for the time, money, and humiliation we're putting ourselves (and our 6 year-old children) through.

    If this is the TSA's best effort and what it believes is the best balance, I want a new TSA.


    OK, then why are hijackings down? I have my working hypothesis. I cited some evidence to support it. If you don't agree, then it is up to you to state an alternative one that is supported by more than unsupported statements.

    I am not saying the TSA (or in my case CATSA) is perfect or haven't mucked things up sometimes. I'm just saying that I believe that they have been mostly responsible for a dramatic drop in airline hijackings. I cited some statistics. Now it's your turn.....

    Your statistics don't unequivocally prove the efficacy of the TSA though. They only show that the TSA employs a cost-benefit method to determine what measures to take.

    Since you believe in the efficacy of the TSA so much, the burden is yours to make a clear and convincing case, not mine. I can provide alternative hypotheses, but I am in no way saying that these are provable at the current moment in time. I'm only saying that they are rational objections to your theory.

    My hypothesis is essentially the same as Lisa's: the protection is coming from our circumstances rather than our deliberative efforts.

    Terrorism is a complex thing. My bet is that as we waged wars in multiple nations, it became more advantageous for fanatics to strike where our military forces were. Without having to gain entry into the country, get past airport security (no matter what odds were), or hijack a plane, terrorists were able to kill over 4,000 Americans in Iraq and nearly 1,500 in Afghanistan. That's almost twice as many as were killed on 9/11.

    If I were the leader of a group intent on killing Americans and Westerners in general, I certainly would go down that route rather than hijack planes.

    ps there is no proof that it wasn't Lisa's rock. There are some very weird causal relationships in the world. Like shooting wolves causes the Aspen to die off in Wyoming. Or .... overfishing the Salmon in the Pacific changes the mix of trees along the rivers of the BC coast.....

    It's pretty clear that it was not the rock. Ecosystems are constantly finding new equilibriums; killing off an herbivore's primary predator should cause a decline in vegetation. That is not surprising, nor is it difficult to prove (you can track all three populations simultaneously). There is also a causal mechanism at work that can explain the effect without the need for new assumptions (Occam's Razor).

    The efficacy of the TSA and our security measures, on the other hand, are quite complex and are affected by numerous causes. Changes in travel patterns, other nations' actions, and an enemey's changing strategy all play a big role. You can't ignore all of these and pronounce our security gimmicks (and really, that's what patting down a 6 year-old is) to be so masterfully effective.




    Scarlet Fever
    Jan 12, 12:45 AM
    Look, I feel as if with all the rumors that were flying around about the iPhone, WE pressured him to release the iPhone by Macworld. He did what we wanted. But it was such a large project that he had to forgo releasing other products that we wanted as well. We expected too much of him, and for you to act like that he is an a-hole for releasing something as revolutionary as the iPhone is just plain indecent. </$0.02>

    seriously, that has to be the most measured, reasonable post i've read about this topic.




    dieselpower44
    Jul 21, 09:46 AM
    I love the way that every time Apple show an image or video of one of their employees "holding" another phone to demonstrate this signal attenuation, they always appear to be literally crushing the phone in their hand. Whereas, with the i4, you just sit it comfortably in the pocket of your palm.

    Apple has become the new Microsoft. They have lost that connection they had with their customers where they would strive to please. Now they just sit back like the rest and go "well you bought it, it's your problem."




    the future
    Sep 12, 07:59 AM
    Film content from Fox and Dreamworks?!

    Look at the german Quicktime page, bottom left, under "iTunes Videos": Transporter 2 from Fox and Red Eye from Dreamworks!!

    http://www.apple.com/de/quicktime/mac.html



    No hay comentarios:

    Publicar un comentario